token.app › Compare › Llama 4 Scout vs Gemini 3.6 Flash
Llama 4 Scout vs Gemini 3.6 Flash
Gemini 3.6 Flash leads on 2 of 2 shared benchmarks. Llama 4 Scout is 20× cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 basis. Llama 4 Scout accepts the larger context window (1.3M).
Head to head
Blended price uses a 3:1 input:output mix
| Llama 4 Scout | Gemini 3.6 Flash | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | |
| Input $/1M | $0.100 | $1.50 |
| Output $/1M | $0.300 | $7.50 |
| Blended $/1M | $0.150 | $3.00 |
| Context window | 1.3M | 1.0M |
| Max output | 16K | 66K |
| Released | Apr 2025 | Jul 2026 |
| Licence | Open weights | Proprietary |
| GPQA Diamond | 51.8% | 94.1% |
| OTIS Mock AIME | 7.8% | 94.2% |
Benchmark scores independently run and published by Epoch AI, 'AI Benchmarking Hub', used under CC BY 4.0. Only benchmarks with a score for BOTH models are compared.
Choose Llama 4 Scout if…
- Costs less per token — $0.150 vs $3.00 blended
- Larger context window (1.3M)
- Open weights — self-hostable
Choose Gemini 3.6 Flash if…
- Higher GPQA Diamond (94.1% vs 51.8%)
- Higher OTIS Mock AIME (94.2% vs 7.8%)
- Newer model (released Jul 2026)
FAQ
Which is better, Llama 4 Scout or Gemini 3.6 Flash?
Across the 2 benchmarks both models have independently-run scores for, Llama 4 Scout leads on 0 and Gemini 3.6 Flash leads on 2. Benchmarks are one input — price and context window are on this page too.
Is Llama 4 Scout cheaper than Gemini 3.6 Flash?
Llama 4 Scout is cheaper: $0.150 versus $3.00 per million tokens blended at 3:1 input:output. Input alone: $0.100 vs $1.50. Output alone: $0.300 vs $7.50.
What context windows do Llama 4 Scout and Gemini 3.6 Flash have?
Llama 4 Scout: 1,310,720 tokens. Gemini 3.6 Flash: 1,048,576 tokens.
Who makes Llama 4 Scout and Gemini 3.6 Flash?
Llama 4 Scout is made by Meta. Gemini 3.6 Flash is made by Google.