token.app โ€บ Compare โ€บ Llama 4 Scout vs Kimi K3

Llama 4 Scout vs Kimi K3

Kimi K3 leads on 2 of 2 shared benchmarks. Llama 4 Scout is 40ร— cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 basis. Llama 4 Scout accepts the larger context window (1.3M).

Head to head
Blended price uses a 3:1 input:output mix
Llama 4 ScoutKimi K3
ProviderMetaMoonshot AI
Input $/1M$0.100$3.00
Output $/1M$0.300$15.00
Blended $/1M$0.150$6.00
Context window1.3M1.0M
Max output16Kโ€”
ReleasedApr 2025Jul 2026
LicenceOpen weightsOpen weights
GPQA Diamond 51.8% 93.1%
OTIS Mock AIME 7.8% 97.2%
Benchmark scores independently run and published by Epoch AI, 'AI Benchmarking Hub', used under CC BY 4.0. Only benchmarks with a score for BOTH models are compared.
Choose Llama 4 Scout ifโ€ฆ
  • Costs less per token โ€” $0.150 vs $6.00 blended
  • Larger context window (1.3M)
Choose Kimi K3 ifโ€ฆ
  • Higher GPQA Diamond (93.1% vs 51.8%)
  • Higher OTIS Mock AIME (97.2% vs 7.8%)
  • Newer model (released Jul 2026)
FAQ
Which is better, Llama 4 Scout or Kimi K3?
Across the 2 benchmarks both models have independently-run scores for, Llama 4 Scout leads on 0 and Kimi K3 leads on 2. Benchmarks are one input โ€” price and context window are on this page too.
Is Llama 4 Scout cheaper than Kimi K3?
Llama 4 Scout is cheaper: $0.150 versus $6.00 per million tokens blended at 3:1 input:output. Input alone: $0.100 vs $3.00. Output alone: $0.300 vs $15.00.
What context windows do Llama 4 Scout and Kimi K3 have?
Llama 4 Scout: 1,310,720 tokens. Kimi K3: 1,048,576 tokens.
Who makes Llama 4 Scout and Kimi K3?
Llama 4 Scout is made by Meta. Kimi K3 is made by Moonshot AI.
Related comparisons