token.app › Compare › Llama 4 Scout vs Phi 4
Llama 4 Scout vs Phi 4
Phi 4 leads on 2 of 2 shared benchmarks. Phi 4 is 1.7× cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 basis. Llama 4 Scout accepts the larger context window (1.3M).
Head to head
Blended price uses a 3:1 input:output mix
| Llama 4 Scout | Phi 4 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | Microsoft |
| Input $/1M | $0.100 | $0.070 |
| Output $/1M | $0.300 | $0.140 |
| Blended $/1M | $0.150 | $0.088 |
| Context window | 1.3M | 16K |
| Max output | 16K | 16K |
| Released | Apr 2025 | Jan 2025 |
| Licence | Open weights | Open weights |
| GPQA Diamond | 51.8% | 56.1% |
| OTIS Mock AIME | 7.8% | 13.8% |
Benchmark scores independently run and published by Epoch AI, 'AI Benchmarking Hub', used under CC BY 4.0. Only benchmarks with a score for BOTH models are compared.
Choose Llama 4 Scout if…
- Larger context window (1.3M)
- Newer model (released Apr 2025)
Choose Phi 4 if…
- Costs less per token — $0.088 vs $0.150 blended
- Higher GPQA Diamond (56.1% vs 51.8%)
- Higher OTIS Mock AIME (13.8% vs 7.8%)
FAQ
Which is better, Llama 4 Scout or Phi 4?
Across the 2 benchmarks both models have independently-run scores for, Llama 4 Scout leads on 0 and Phi 4 leads on 2. Benchmarks are one input — price and context window are on this page too.
Is Llama 4 Scout cheaper than Phi 4?
Phi 4 is cheaper: $0.088 versus $0.150 per million tokens blended at 3:1 input:output. Input alone: $0.100 vs $0.070. Output alone: $0.300 vs $0.140.
What context windows do Llama 4 Scout and Phi 4 have?
Llama 4 Scout: 1,310,720 tokens. Phi 4: 16,384 tokens.
Who makes Llama 4 Scout and Phi 4?
Llama 4 Scout is made by Meta. Phi 4 is made by Microsoft.