token.app › Compare › Llama Guard 4 12B vs DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731

Llama Guard 4 12B vs DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731

Llama Guard 4 12B is 3.7× cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 basis. DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 accepts the larger context window (1.0M).

Head to head
Blended price uses a 3:1 input:output mix
Llama Guard 4 12BDeepSeek V4 Flash 0731
ProviderMetaDeepSeek
Input $/1M$0.180$0.440
Output $/1M$0.180$1.32
Blended $/1M$0.180$0.660
Context window164K1.0M
Max output16K131K
ReleasedApr 2025Jul 2026
LicenceOpen weightsOpen weights
Choose Llama Guard 4 12B if…
  • Costs less per token — $0.180 vs $0.660 blended
Choose DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 if…
  • Larger context window (1.0M)
  • Newer model (released Jul 2026)
FAQ
Which is better, Llama Guard 4 12B or DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731?
We do not hold independently-run benchmark scores covering both Llama Guard 4 12B and DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731, so we make no quality claim. Their pricing and specifications are compared on this page.
Is Llama Guard 4 12B cheaper than DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731?
Llama Guard 4 12B is cheaper: $0.180 versus $0.660 per million tokens blended at 3:1 input:output. Input alone: $0.180 vs $0.440. Output alone: $0.180 vs $1.32.
What context windows do Llama Guard 4 12B and DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 have?
Llama Guard 4 12B: 163,840 tokens. DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731: 1,048,576 tokens.
Who makes Llama Guard 4 12B and DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731?
Llama Guard 4 12B is made by Meta. DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 is made by DeepSeek.
Related comparisons
Llama Guard 4 12B full details DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 full details Llama Guard 4 12B vs Flint (free) Llama Guard 4 12B vs MiniMax M3.1 Flash (free) Llama Guard 4 12B vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 Llama Guard 4 12B vs Glimpse Llama Guard 4 12B vs Xing4.0 29B A4B (free) Llama Guard 4 12B vs Beam 1.0 501B A23B