token.app › Compare › Llama Guard 4 12B vs DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731
Llama Guard 4 12B vs DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731
DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 is 1.6× cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 basis.
Head to head
Blended price uses a 3:1 input:output mix
| Llama Guard 4 12B | DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | DeepSeek |
| Input $/1M | $0.180 | $0.090 |
| Output $/1M | $0.180 | $0.180 |
| Blended $/1M | $0.180 | $0.113 |
| Context window | 1.0M | 1.0M |
| Max output | 16K | 384K |
| Released | Apr 2025 | Jul 2026 |
| Licence | Open weights | Open weights |
Choose Llama Guard 4 12B if…
- No clear advantage on the data we hold.
Choose DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 if…
- Costs less per token — $0.113 vs $0.180 blended
- Newer model (released Jul 2026)
FAQ
Which is better, Llama Guard 4 12B or DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731?
We do not hold independently-run benchmark scores covering both Llama Guard 4 12B and DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731, so we make no quality claim. Their pricing and specifications are compared on this page.
Is Llama Guard 4 12B cheaper than DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731?
DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 is cheaper: $0.113 versus $0.180 per million tokens blended at 3:1 input:output. Input alone: $0.180 vs $0.090. Output alone: $0.180 vs $0.180.
What context windows do Llama Guard 4 12B and DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 have?
Llama Guard 4 12B: 1,048,576 tokens. DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731: 1,048,576 tokens.
Who makes Llama Guard 4 12B and DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731?
Llama Guard 4 12B is made by Meta. DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 is made by DeepSeek.
Related comparisons