token.app › Compare › Llama Guard 4 12B vs Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite

Llama Guard 4 12B vs Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite

Llama Guard 4 12B is 4.7× cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 basis. Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite accepts the larger context window (1.0M).

Head to head
Blended price uses a 3:1 input:output mix
Llama Guard 4 12BGemini 3.5 Flash Lite
ProviderMetaGoogle
Input $/1M$0.180$0.300
Output $/1M$0.180$2.50
Blended $/1M$0.180$0.850
Context window164K1.0M
Max output16K66K
ReleasedApr 2025Jul 2026
LicenceOpen weightsProprietary
Choose Llama Guard 4 12B if…
  • Costs less per token — $0.180 vs $0.850 blended
  • Open weights — self-hostable
Choose Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite if…
  • Larger context window (1.0M)
  • Newer model (released Jul 2026)
FAQ
Which is better, Llama Guard 4 12B or Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite?
We do not hold independently-run benchmark scores covering both Llama Guard 4 12B and Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite, so we make no quality claim. Their pricing and specifications are compared on this page.
Is Llama Guard 4 12B cheaper than Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite?
Llama Guard 4 12B is cheaper: $0.180 versus $0.850 per million tokens blended at 3:1 input:output. Input alone: $0.180 vs $0.300. Output alone: $0.180 vs $2.50.
What context windows do Llama Guard 4 12B and Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite have?
Llama Guard 4 12B: 163,840 tokens. Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 1,048,576 tokens.
Who makes Llama Guard 4 12B and Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite?
Llama Guard 4 12B is made by Meta. Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite is made by Google.
Related comparisons
Llama Guard 4 12B full details Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite full details Llama Guard 4 12B vs Flint (free) Llama Guard 4 12B vs MiniMax M3.1 Flash (free) Llama Guard 4 12B vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 Llama Guard 4 12B vs Glimpse Llama Guard 4 12B vs Xing4.0 29B A4B (free) Llama Guard 4 12B vs Beam 1.0 501B A23B