token.app › Compare › Llama Guard 4 12B vs Grok 4.6
Llama Guard 4 12B vs Grok 4.6
Llama Guard 4 12B is 17× cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 basis. Grok 4.6 accepts the larger context window (500K).
Head to head
Blended price uses a 3:1 input:output mix
| Llama Guard 4 12B | Grok 4.6 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | SpaceXAI |
| Input $/1M | $0.180 | $2.00 |
| Output $/1M | $0.180 | $6.00 |
| Blended $/1M | $0.180 | $3.00 |
| Context window | 164K | 500K |
| Max output | 16K | 450K |
| Released | Apr 2025 | Aug 2026 |
| Licence | Open weights | Proprietary |
Choose Llama Guard 4 12B if…
- Costs less per token — $0.180 vs $3.00 blended
- Open weights — self-hostable
Choose Grok 4.6 if…
- Larger context window (500K)
- Newer model (released Aug 2026)
FAQ
Which is better, Llama Guard 4 12B or Grok 4.6?
We do not hold independently-run benchmark scores covering both Llama Guard 4 12B and Grok 4.6, so we make no quality claim. Their pricing and specifications are compared on this page.
Is Llama Guard 4 12B cheaper than Grok 4.6?
Llama Guard 4 12B is cheaper: $0.180 versus $3.00 per million tokens blended at 3:1 input:output. Input alone: $0.180 vs $2.00. Output alone: $0.180 vs $6.00.
What context windows do Llama Guard 4 12B and Grok 4.6 have?
Llama Guard 4 12B: 163,840 tokens. Grok 4.6: 500,000 tokens.
Who makes Llama Guard 4 12B and Grok 4.6?
Llama Guard 4 12B is made by Meta. Grok 4.6 is made by SpaceXAI.
Related comparisons