token.app › Compare › Llama Guard 4 12B vs Inkling Small
Llama Guard 4 12B vs Inkling Small
Llama Guard 4 12B is 3.5× cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 basis. Llama Guard 4 12B accepts the larger context window (1.0M).
Head to head
Blended price uses a 3:1 input:output mix
| Llama Guard 4 12B | Inkling Small | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | Thinkingmachines |
| Input $/1M | $0.180 | $0.450 |
| Output $/1M | $0.180 | $1.20 |
| Blended $/1M | $0.180 | $0.637 |
| Context window | 1.0M | 524K |
| Max output | 16K | 262K |
| Released | Apr 2025 | Jul 2026 |
| Licence | Open weights | Open weights |
Choose Llama Guard 4 12B if…
- Costs less per token — $0.180 vs $0.637 blended
- Larger context window (1.0M)
Choose Inkling Small if…
- Newer model (released Jul 2026)
FAQ
Which is better, Llama Guard 4 12B or Inkling Small?
We do not hold independently-run benchmark scores covering both Llama Guard 4 12B and Inkling Small, so we make no quality claim. Their pricing and specifications are compared on this page.
Is Llama Guard 4 12B cheaper than Inkling Small?
Llama Guard 4 12B is cheaper: $0.180 versus $0.637 per million tokens blended at 3:1 input:output. Input alone: $0.180 vs $0.450. Output alone: $0.180 vs $1.20.
What context windows do Llama Guard 4 12B and Inkling Small have?
Llama Guard 4 12B: 1,048,576 tokens. Inkling Small: 524,288 tokens.
Who makes Llama Guard 4 12B and Inkling Small?
Llama Guard 4 12B is made by Meta. Inkling Small is made by Thinkingmachines.
Related comparisons