token.app › Compare › Llama Guard 4 12B vs Qwen3.7 Flash
Llama Guard 4 12B vs Qwen3.7 Flash
Qwen3.7 Flash is 3.3× cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 basis. Llama Guard 4 12B accepts the larger context window (1.0M).
Head to head
Blended price uses a 3:1 input:output mix
| Llama Guard 4 12B | Qwen3.7 Flash | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | Alibaba |
| Input $/1M | $0.180 | $0.030 |
| Output $/1M | $0.180 | $0.130 |
| Blended $/1M | $0.180 | $0.055 |
| Context window | 1.0M | 1M |
| Max output | 16K | 66K |
| Released | Apr 2025 | Jul 2026 |
| Licence | Open weights | Proprietary |
Choose Llama Guard 4 12B if…
- Larger context window (1.0M)
- Open weights — self-hostable
Choose Qwen3.7 Flash if…
- Costs less per token — $0.055 vs $0.180 blended
- Newer model (released Jul 2026)
FAQ
Which is better, Llama Guard 4 12B or Qwen3.7 Flash?
We do not hold independently-run benchmark scores covering both Llama Guard 4 12B and Qwen3.7 Flash, so we make no quality claim. Their pricing and specifications are compared on this page.
Is Llama Guard 4 12B cheaper than Qwen3.7 Flash?
Qwen3.7 Flash is cheaper: $0.055 versus $0.180 per million tokens blended at 3:1 input:output. Input alone: $0.180 vs $0.030. Output alone: $0.180 vs $0.130.
What context windows do Llama Guard 4 12B and Qwen3.7 Flash have?
Llama Guard 4 12B: 1,048,576 tokens. Qwen3.7 Flash: 1,000,000 tokens.
Who makes Llama Guard 4 12B and Qwen3.7 Flash?
Llama Guard 4 12B is made by Meta. Qwen3.7 Flash is made by Alibaba.
Related comparisons