token.app › Compare › MiniMax M3 vs Qwen3.7 Flash
MiniMax M3 vs Qwen3.7 Flash
MiniMax M3 and Qwen3.7 Flash split the 2 shared benchmarks evenly. Qwen3.7 Flash is 9.5× cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 basis. MiniMax M3 accepts the larger context window (1.0M).
Head to head
Blended price uses a 3:1 input:output mix
| MiniMax M3 | Qwen3.7 Flash | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | MiniMax | Alibaba |
| Input $/1M | $0.300 | $0.030 |
| Output $/1M | $1.20 | $0.130 |
| Blended $/1M | $0.525 | $0.055 |
| Context window | 1.0M | 1M |
| Max output | 512K | 66K |
| Released | May 2026 | Jul 2026 |
| Licence | Open weights | Proprietary |
| GPQA Diamond | 90.9% | 82.3% |
| OTIS Mock AIME | 71.1% | 86.7% |
Benchmark scores independently run and published by Epoch AI, 'AI Benchmarking Hub', used under CC BY 4.0. Only benchmarks with a score for BOTH models are compared.
Choose MiniMax M3 if…
- Higher GPQA Diamond (90.9% vs 82.3%)
- Larger context window (1.0M)
- Open weights — self-hostable
Choose Qwen3.7 Flash if…
- Costs less per token — $0.055 vs $0.525 blended
- Higher OTIS Mock AIME (86.7% vs 71.1%)
- Newer model (released Jul 2026)
FAQ
Which is better, MiniMax M3 or Qwen3.7 Flash?
Across the 2 benchmarks both models have independently-run scores for, MiniMax M3 leads on 1 and Qwen3.7 Flash leads on 1. Benchmarks are one input — price and context window are on this page too.
Is MiniMax M3 cheaper than Qwen3.7 Flash?
Qwen3.7 Flash is cheaper: $0.055 versus $0.525 per million tokens blended at 3:1 input:output. Input alone: $0.300 vs $0.030. Output alone: $1.20 vs $0.130.
What context windows do MiniMax M3 and Qwen3.7 Flash have?
MiniMax M3: 1,048,576 tokens. Qwen3.7 Flash: 1,000,000 tokens.
Who makes MiniMax M3 and Qwen3.7 Flash?
MiniMax M3 is made by MiniMax. Qwen3.7 Flash is made by Alibaba.