token.app › Compare › MiniMax M3.1 Flash vs Qwen3.7 Flash
MiniMax M3.1 Flash vs Qwen3.7 Flash
Qwen3.7 Flash is 4.8× cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 basis.
Head to head
Blended price uses a 3:1 input:output mix
| MiniMax M3.1 Flash | Qwen3.7 Flash | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | MiniMax | Alibaba |
| Input $/1M | $0.150 | $0.030 |
| Output $/1M | $0.600 | $0.130 |
| Blended $/1M | $0.262 | $0.055 |
| Context window | 1M | 1M |
| Max output | 524K | 66K |
| Released | Oct 2026 | Jul 2026 |
| Licence | Proprietary | Proprietary |
Choose MiniMax M3.1 Flash if…
- Newer model (released Oct 2026)
Choose Qwen3.7 Flash if…
- Costs less per token — $0.055 vs $0.262 blended
FAQ
Which is better, MiniMax M3.1 Flash or Qwen3.7 Flash?
We do not hold independently-run benchmark scores covering both MiniMax M3.1 Flash and Qwen3.7 Flash, so we make no quality claim. Their pricing and specifications are compared on this page.
Is MiniMax M3.1 Flash cheaper than Qwen3.7 Flash?
Qwen3.7 Flash is cheaper: $0.055 versus $0.262 per million tokens blended at 3:1 input:output. Input alone: $0.150 vs $0.030. Output alone: $0.600 vs $0.130.
What context windows do MiniMax M3.1 Flash and Qwen3.7 Flash have?
MiniMax M3.1 Flash: 1,000,000 tokens. Qwen3.7 Flash: 1,000,000 tokens.
Who makes MiniMax M3.1 Flash and Qwen3.7 Flash?
MiniMax M3.1 Flash is made by MiniMax. Qwen3.7 Flash is made by Alibaba.
Related comparisons