token.app › Compare › Mistral Large vs Qwen3.7 Flash
Mistral Large vs Qwen3.7 Flash
Qwen3.7 Flash is 55× cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 basis. Qwen3.7 Flash accepts the larger context window (1M).
Head to head
Blended price uses a 3:1 input:output mix
| Mistral Large | Qwen3.7 Flash | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Mistral AI | Alibaba |
| Input $/1M | $2.00 | $0.030 |
| Output $/1M | $6.00 | $0.130 |
| Blended $/1M | $3.00 | $0.055 |
| Context window | 128K | 1M |
| Max output | — | 66K |
| Released | Feb 2024 | Jul 2026 |
| Licence | Proprietary | Proprietary |
Choose Mistral Large if…
- No clear advantage on the data we hold.
Choose Qwen3.7 Flash if…
- Costs less per token — $0.055 vs $3.00 blended
- Larger context window (1M)
- Newer model (released Jul 2026)
FAQ
Which is better, Mistral Large or Qwen3.7 Flash?
We do not hold independently-run benchmark scores covering both Mistral Large and Qwen3.7 Flash, so we make no quality claim. Their pricing and specifications are compared on this page.
Is Mistral Large cheaper than Qwen3.7 Flash?
Qwen3.7 Flash is cheaper: $0.055 versus $3.00 per million tokens blended at 3:1 input:output. Input alone: $2.00 vs $0.030. Output alone: $6.00 vs $0.130.
What context windows do Mistral Large and Qwen3.7 Flash have?
Mistral Large: 128,000 tokens. Qwen3.7 Flash: 1,000,000 tokens.
Who makes Mistral Large and Qwen3.7 Flash?
Mistral Large is made by Mistral AI. Qwen3.7 Flash is made by Alibaba.