token.app › Compare › Mistral Large vs Qwen3.8 Max

Mistral Large vs Qwen3.8 Max

Qwen3.8 Max leads on 2 of 2 shared benchmarks. Qwen3.8 Max accepts the larger context window (1M).

Head to head
Blended price uses a 3:1 input:output mix
Mistral LargeQwen3.8 Max
ProviderMistral AIAlibaba
Input $/1M$2.00$2.00
Output $/1M$6.00$6.00
Blended $/1M$3.00$3.00
Context window128K1M
Max output131K
ReleasedFeb 2024Aug 2026
LicenceProprietaryProprietary
GPQA Diamond 38.8% 92.7%
OTIS Mock AIME 1.9% 99.4%
Benchmark scores independently run and published by Epoch AI, 'AI Benchmarking Hub', used under CC BY 4.0. Only benchmarks with a score for BOTH models are compared.
Choose Mistral Large if…
  • No clear advantage on the data we hold.
Choose Qwen3.8 Max if…
  • Higher GPQA Diamond (92.7% vs 38.8%)
  • Higher OTIS Mock AIME (99.4% vs 1.9%)
  • Larger context window (1M)
  • Newer model (released Aug 2026)
FAQ
Which is better, Mistral Large or Qwen3.8 Max?
Across the 2 benchmarks both models have independently-run scores for, Mistral Large leads on 0 and Qwen3.8 Max leads on 2. Benchmarks are one input — price and context window are on this page too.
Is Mistral Large cheaper than Qwen3.8 Max?
They cost the same on a blended 3:1 basis: $3.00 per million tokens.
What context windows do Mistral Large and Qwen3.8 Max have?
Mistral Large: 128,000 tokens. Qwen3.8 Max: 1,000,000 tokens.
Who makes Mistral Large and Qwen3.8 Max?
Mistral Large is made by Mistral AI. Qwen3.8 Max is made by Alibaba.
Related comparisons