token.app › Compare › Mistral Medium 3.5 vs Beam 1.0 501B A23B

Mistral Medium 3.5 vs Beam 1.0 501B A23B

Beam 1.0 501B A23B is 6.9× cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 basis. Beam 1.0 501B A23B accepts the larger context window (1.0M).

Head to head
Blended price uses a 3:1 input:output mix
Mistral Medium 3.5Beam 1.0 501B A23B
ProviderMistral AIReflection
Input $/1M$1.50$0.250
Output $/1M$7.50$1.00
Blended $/1M$3.00$0.438
Context window262K1.0M
Max output210K131K
ReleasedApr 2026Oct 2026
LicenceProprietaryOpen weights
Choose Mistral Medium 3.5 if…
  • No clear advantage on the data we hold.
Choose Beam 1.0 501B A23B if…
  • Costs less per token — $0.438 vs $3.00 blended
  • Larger context window (1.0M)
  • Open weights — self-hostable
  • Newer model (released Oct 2026)
FAQ
Which is better, Mistral Medium 3.5 or Beam 1.0 501B A23B?
We do not hold independently-run benchmark scores covering both Mistral Medium 3.5 and Beam 1.0 501B A23B, so we make no quality claim. Their pricing and specifications are compared on this page.
Is Mistral Medium 3.5 cheaper than Beam 1.0 501B A23B?
Beam 1.0 501B A23B is cheaper: $0.438 versus $3.00 per million tokens blended at 3:1 input:output. Input alone: $1.50 vs $0.250. Output alone: $7.50 vs $1.00.
What context windows do Mistral Medium 3.5 and Beam 1.0 501B A23B have?
Mistral Medium 3.5: 262,144 tokens. Beam 1.0 501B A23B: 1,048,576 tokens.
Who makes Mistral Medium 3.5 and Beam 1.0 501B A23B?
Mistral Medium 3.5 is made by Mistral AI. Beam 1.0 501B A23B is made by Reflection.
Related comparisons
Mistral Medium 3.5 full details Beam 1.0 501B A23B full details Mistral Medium 3.5 vs Flint (free) Mistral Medium 3.5 vs MiniMax M3.1 Flash (free) Mistral Medium 3.5 vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 Mistral Medium 3.5 vs Glimpse Mistral Medium 3.5 vs Xing4.0 29B A4B (free) Mistral Medium 3.5 vs Mercury 3