token.app › Compare › Mistral Medium 3.5 vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017

Mistral Medium 3.5 vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 is 11× cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 basis. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 accepts the larger context window (1.0M).

Head to head
Blended price uses a 3:1 input:output mix
Mistral Medium 3.5DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
ProviderMistral AIDeepSeek
Input $/1M$1.50$0.150
Output $/1M$7.50$0.600
Blended $/1M$3.00$0.262
Context window262K1.0M
Max output210K393K
ReleasedApr 2026Oct 2026
LicenceProprietaryOpen weights
Choose Mistral Medium 3.5 if…
  • No clear advantage on the data we hold.
Choose DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 if…
  • Costs less per token — $0.262 vs $3.00 blended
  • Larger context window (1.0M)
  • Open weights — self-hostable
  • Newer model (released Oct 2026)
FAQ
Which is better, Mistral Medium 3.5 or DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017?
We do not hold independently-run benchmark scores covering both Mistral Medium 3.5 and DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017, so we make no quality claim. Their pricing and specifications are compared on this page.
Is Mistral Medium 3.5 cheaper than DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017?
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 is cheaper: $0.262 versus $3.00 per million tokens blended at 3:1 input:output. Input alone: $1.50 vs $0.150. Output alone: $7.50 vs $0.600.
What context windows do Mistral Medium 3.5 and DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 have?
Mistral Medium 3.5: 262,144 tokens. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017: 1,048,576 tokens.
Who makes Mistral Medium 3.5 and DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017?
Mistral Medium 3.5 is made by Mistral AI. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 is made by DeepSeek.
Related comparisons
Mistral Medium 3.5 full details DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 full details Mistral Medium 3.5 vs Flint (free) Mistral Medium 3.5 vs MiniMax M3.1 Flash (free) Mistral Medium 3.5 vs Glimpse Mistral Medium 3.5 vs Xing4.0 29B A4B (free) Mistral Medium 3.5 vs Beam 1.0 501B A23B Mistral Medium 3.5 vs Mercury 3