token.app › Compare › Mistral Medium 3 vs Beam 1.0 501B A23B

Mistral Medium 3 vs Beam 1.0 501B A23B

Beam 1.0 501B A23B is 1.8× cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 basis. Beam 1.0 501B A23B accepts the larger context window (1.0M).

Head to head
Blended price uses a 3:1 input:output mix
Mistral Medium 3Beam 1.0 501B A23B
ProviderMistral AIReflection
Input $/1M$0.400$0.250
Output $/1M$2.00$1.00
Blended $/1M$0.800$0.438
Context window131K1.0M
Max output105K131K
ReleasedMay 2025Oct 2026
LicenceProprietaryOpen weights
Choose Mistral Medium 3 if…
  • No clear advantage on the data we hold.
Choose Beam 1.0 501B A23B if…
  • Costs less per token — $0.438 vs $0.800 blended
  • Larger context window (1.0M)
  • Open weights — self-hostable
  • Newer model (released Oct 2026)
FAQ
Which is better, Mistral Medium 3 or Beam 1.0 501B A23B?
We do not hold independently-run benchmark scores covering both Mistral Medium 3 and Beam 1.0 501B A23B, so we make no quality claim. Their pricing and specifications are compared on this page.
Is Mistral Medium 3 cheaper than Beam 1.0 501B A23B?
Beam 1.0 501B A23B is cheaper: $0.438 versus $0.800 per million tokens blended at 3:1 input:output. Input alone: $0.400 vs $0.250. Output alone: $2.00 vs $1.00.
What context windows do Mistral Medium 3 and Beam 1.0 501B A23B have?
Mistral Medium 3: 131,072 tokens. Beam 1.0 501B A23B: 1,048,576 tokens.
Who makes Mistral Medium 3 and Beam 1.0 501B A23B?
Mistral Medium 3 is made by Mistral AI. Beam 1.0 501B A23B is made by Reflection.
Related comparisons