token.app › Compare › Mistral Medium 3 vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
Mistral Medium 3 vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 is 3.0× cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 basis. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 accepts the larger context window (1.0M).
Head to head
Blended price uses a 3:1 input:output mix
| Mistral Medium 3 | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Mistral AI | DeepSeek |
| Input $/1M | $0.400 | $0.150 |
| Output $/1M | $2.00 | $0.600 |
| Blended $/1M | $0.800 | $0.262 |
| Context window | 131K | 1.0M |
| Max output | 105K | 393K |
| Released | May 2025 | Oct 2026 |
| Licence | Proprietary | Open weights |
Choose Mistral Medium 3 if…
- No clear advantage on the data we hold.
Choose DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 if…
- Costs less per token — $0.262 vs $0.800 blended
- Larger context window (1.0M)
- Open weights — self-hostable
- Newer model (released Oct 2026)
FAQ
Which is better, Mistral Medium 3 or DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017?
We do not hold independently-run benchmark scores covering both Mistral Medium 3 and DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017, so we make no quality claim. Their pricing and specifications are compared on this page.
Is Mistral Medium 3 cheaper than DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017?
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 is cheaper: $0.262 versus $0.800 per million tokens blended at 3:1 input:output. Input alone: $0.400 vs $0.150. Output alone: $2.00 vs $0.600.
What context windows do Mistral Medium 3 and DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 have?
Mistral Medium 3: 131,072 tokens. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017: 1,048,576 tokens.
Who makes Mistral Medium 3 and DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017?
Mistral Medium 3 is made by Mistral AI. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 is made by DeepSeek.
Related comparisons