token.app › Compare › Mistral Medium 3.1 (batch) vs Beam 1.0 501B A23B

Mistral Medium 3.1 (batch) vs Beam 1.0 501B A23B

Mistral Medium 3.1 (batch) is 1.1× cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 basis. Beam 1.0 501B A23B accepts the larger context window (1.0M).

Head to head
Blended price uses a 3:1 input:output mix
Mistral Medium 3.1 (batch)Beam 1.0 501B A23B
ProviderMistral AIReflection
Input $/1M$0.200$0.250
Output $/1M$1.00$1.00
Blended $/1M$0.400$0.438
Context window131K1.0M
Max output105K131K
ReleasedAug 2025Oct 2026
LicenceProprietaryOpen weights
Choose Mistral Medium 3.1 (batch) if…
  • Costs less per token — $0.400 vs $0.438 blended
Choose Beam 1.0 501B A23B if…
  • Larger context window (1.0M)
  • Open weights — self-hostable
  • Newer model (released Oct 2026)
FAQ
Which is better, Mistral Medium 3.1 (batch) or Beam 1.0 501B A23B?
We do not hold independently-run benchmark scores covering both Mistral Medium 3.1 (batch) and Beam 1.0 501B A23B, so we make no quality claim. Their pricing and specifications are compared on this page.
Is Mistral Medium 3.1 (batch) cheaper than Beam 1.0 501B A23B?
Mistral Medium 3.1 (batch) is cheaper: $0.400 versus $0.438 per million tokens blended at 3:1 input:output. Input alone: $0.200 vs $0.250. Output alone: $1.00 vs $1.00.
What context windows do Mistral Medium 3.1 (batch) and Beam 1.0 501B A23B have?
Mistral Medium 3.1 (batch): 131,072 tokens. Beam 1.0 501B A23B: 1,048,576 tokens.
Who makes Mistral Medium 3.1 (batch) and Beam 1.0 501B A23B?
Mistral Medium 3.1 (batch) is made by Mistral AI. Beam 1.0 501B A23B is made by Reflection.
Related comparisons