token.app › Compare › Mistral Medium 3.1 (batch) vs Flint (free)

Mistral Medium 3.1 (batch) vs Flint (free)

Flint (free) is free to use, against $0.400 per million tokens. Flint (free) accepts the larger context window (262K).

Head to head
Blended price uses a 3:1 input:output mix
Mistral Medium 3.1 (batch)Flint (free)
ProviderMistral AIRecursive
Input $/1M$0.200Free
Output $/1M$1.00Free
Blended $/1M$0.400Free
Context window131K262K
Max output105K236K
ReleasedAug 2025Oct 2026
LicenceProprietaryOpen weights
Choose Mistral Medium 3.1 (batch) if…
  • No clear advantage on the data we hold.
Choose Flint (free) if…
  • Costs less per token — Free vs $0.400 blended
  • Larger context window (262K)
  • Open weights — self-hostable
  • Newer model (released Oct 2026)
FAQ
Which is better, Mistral Medium 3.1 (batch) or Flint (free)?
We do not hold independently-run benchmark scores covering both Mistral Medium 3.1 (batch) and Flint (free), so we make no quality claim. Their pricing and specifications are compared on this page.
Is Mistral Medium 3.1 (batch) cheaper than Flint (free)?
Flint (free) is cheaper: Free versus $0.400 per million tokens blended at 3:1 input:output. Input alone: $0.200 vs Free. Output alone: $1.00 vs Free.
What context windows do Mistral Medium 3.1 (batch) and Flint (free) have?
Mistral Medium 3.1 (batch): 131,072 tokens. Flint (free): 262,144 tokens.
Who makes Mistral Medium 3.1 (batch) and Flint (free)?
Mistral Medium 3.1 (batch) is made by Mistral AI. Flint (free) is made by Recursive.
Related comparisons
Mistral Medium 3.1 (batch) full details Flint (free) full details Mistral Medium 3.1 (batch) vs MiniMax M3.1 Flash (free) Mistral Medium 3.1 (batch) vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 Mistral Medium 3.1 (batch) vs Glimpse Mistral Medium 3.1 (batch) vs Xing4.0 29B A4B (free) Mistral Medium 3.1 (batch) vs Beam 1.0 501B A23B Mistral Medium 3.1 (batch) vs Mercury 3