token.app › Compare › Mistral Small 3.2 24B vs Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite

Mistral Small 3.2 24B vs Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite

Mistral Small 3.2 24B is 6.4× cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 basis. Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite accepts the larger context window (1.0M).

Head to head
Blended price uses a 3:1 input:output mix
Mistral Small 3.2 24BGemini 3.5 Flash Lite
ProviderMistral AIGoogle
Input $/1M$0.094$0.300
Output $/1M$0.250$2.50
Blended $/1M$0.133$0.850
Context window256K1.0M
Max output16K66K
ReleasedJun 2025Jul 2026
LicenceOpen weightsProprietary
Choose Mistral Small 3.2 24B if…
  • Costs less per token — $0.133 vs $0.850 blended
  • Open weights — self-hostable
Choose Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite if…
  • Larger context window (1.0M)
  • Newer model (released Jul 2026)
FAQ
Which is better, Mistral Small 3.2 24B or Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite?
We do not hold independently-run benchmark scores covering both Mistral Small 3.2 24B and Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite, so we make no quality claim. Their pricing and specifications are compared on this page.
Is Mistral Small 3.2 24B cheaper than Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite?
Mistral Small 3.2 24B is cheaper: $0.133 versus $0.850 per million tokens blended at 3:1 input:output. Input alone: $0.094 vs $0.300. Output alone: $0.250 vs $2.50.
What context windows do Mistral Small 3.2 24B and Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite have?
Mistral Small 3.2 24B: 256,000 tokens. Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 1,048,576 tokens.
Who makes Mistral Small 3.2 24B and Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite?
Mistral Small 3.2 24B is made by Mistral AI. Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite is made by Google.
Related comparisons
Mistral Small 3.2 24B full details Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite full details Mistral Small 3.2 24B vs Flint (free) Mistral Small 3.2 24B vs MiniMax M3.1 Flash (free) Mistral Small 3.2 24B vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 Mistral Small 3.2 24B vs Glimpse Mistral Small 3.2 24B vs Xing4.0 29B A4B (free) Mistral Small 3.2 24B vs Beam 1.0 501B A23B