token.app › Compare › Mistral Small 3.2 24B vs GPT-5.6 Luna

Mistral Small 3.2 24B vs GPT-5.6 Luna

Mistral Small 3.2 24B is 1.7× cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 basis. GPT-5.6 Luna accepts the larger context window (1.1M).

Head to head
Blended price uses a 3:1 input:output mix
Mistral Small 3.2 24BGPT-5.6 Luna
ProviderMistral AIOpenAI
Input $/1M$0.094$0.100
Output $/1M$0.250$0.600
Blended $/1M$0.133$0.225
Context window256K1.1M
Max output16K128K
ReleasedJun 2025Jul 2026
LicenceOpen weightsProprietary
Choose Mistral Small 3.2 24B if…
  • Costs less per token — $0.133 vs $0.225 blended
  • Open weights — self-hostable
Choose GPT-5.6 Luna if…
  • Larger context window (1.1M)
  • Newer model (released Jul 2026)
FAQ
Which is better, Mistral Small 3.2 24B or GPT-5.6 Luna?
We do not hold independently-run benchmark scores covering both Mistral Small 3.2 24B and GPT-5.6 Luna, so we make no quality claim. Their pricing and specifications are compared on this page.
Is Mistral Small 3.2 24B cheaper than GPT-5.6 Luna?
Mistral Small 3.2 24B is cheaper: $0.133 versus $0.225 per million tokens blended at 3:1 input:output. Input alone: $0.094 vs $0.100. Output alone: $0.250 vs $0.600.
What context windows do Mistral Small 3.2 24B and GPT-5.6 Luna have?
Mistral Small 3.2 24B: 256,000 tokens. GPT-5.6 Luna: 1,050,000 tokens.
Who makes Mistral Small 3.2 24B and GPT-5.6 Luna?
Mistral Small 3.2 24B is made by Mistral AI. GPT-5.6 Luna is made by OpenAI.
Related comparisons