token.app › Compare › Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B vs Gemini 3.7 Flash

Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B vs Gemini 3.7 Flash

Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B is 14× cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 basis. Gemini 3.7 Flash accepts the larger context window (1.0M).

Head to head
Blended price uses a 3:1 input:output mix
Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3BGemini 3.7 Flash
ProviderNVIDIAGoogle
Input $/1M$0.060$0.750
Output $/1M$0.240$3.75
Blended $/1M$0.105$1.50
Context window262K1.0M
Max output236K66K
ReleasedDec 2025Aug 2026
LicenceOpen weightsProprietary
Choose Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B if…
  • Costs less per token — $0.105 vs $1.50 blended
  • Open weights — self-hostable
Choose Gemini 3.7 Flash if…
  • Larger context window (1.0M)
  • Newer model (released Aug 2026)
FAQ
Which is better, Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B or Gemini 3.7 Flash?
We do not hold independently-run benchmark scores covering both Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B and Gemini 3.7 Flash, so we make no quality claim. Their pricing and specifications are compared on this page.
Is Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B cheaper than Gemini 3.7 Flash?
Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B is cheaper: $0.105 versus $1.50 per million tokens blended at 3:1 input:output. Input alone: $0.060 vs $0.750. Output alone: $0.240 vs $3.75.
What context windows do Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B and Gemini 3.7 Flash have?
Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B: 262,144 tokens. Gemini 3.7 Flash: 1,048,576 tokens.
Who makes Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B and Gemini 3.7 Flash?
Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B is made by NVIDIA. Gemini 3.7 Flash is made by Google.
Related comparisons