token.app › Compare › Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B vs Grok 4.6

Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B vs Grok 4.6

Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B is 29× cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 basis. Grok 4.6 accepts the larger context window (500K).

Head to head
Blended price uses a 3:1 input:output mix
Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3BGrok 4.6
ProviderNVIDIASpaceXAI
Input $/1M$0.060$2.00
Output $/1M$0.240$6.00
Blended $/1M$0.105$3.00
Context window262K500K
Max output236K450K
ReleasedDec 2025Aug 2026
LicenceOpen weightsProprietary
Choose Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B if…
  • Costs less per token — $0.105 vs $3.00 blended
  • Open weights — self-hostable
Choose Grok 4.6 if…
  • Larger context window (500K)
  • Newer model (released Aug 2026)
FAQ
Which is better, Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B or Grok 4.6?
We do not hold independently-run benchmark scores covering both Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B and Grok 4.6, so we make no quality claim. Their pricing and specifications are compared on this page.
Is Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B cheaper than Grok 4.6?
Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B is cheaper: $0.105 versus $3.00 per million tokens blended at 3:1 input:output. Input alone: $0.060 vs $2.00. Output alone: $0.240 vs $6.00.
What context windows do Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B and Grok 4.6 have?
Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B: 262,144 tokens. Grok 4.6: 500,000 tokens.
Who makes Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B and Grok 4.6?
Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B is made by NVIDIA. Grok 4.6 is made by SpaceXAI.
Related comparisons
Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B full details Grok 4.6 full details Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B vs Flint (free) Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B vs MiniMax M3.1 Flash (free) Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B vs Glimpse Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B vs Xing4.0 29B A4B (free) Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B vs Beam 1.0 501B A23B