token.app › Compare › Nemotron 3 Ultra vs Qwen3.7 Flash
Nemotron 3 Ultra vs Qwen3.7 Flash
Qwen3.7 Flash is 25× cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 basis. Qwen3.7 Flash accepts the larger context window (1M).
Head to head
Blended price uses a 3:1 input:output mix
| Nemotron 3 Ultra | Qwen3.7 Flash | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | NVIDIA | Alibaba |
| Input $/1M | $0.600 | $0.030 |
| Output $/1M | $3.60 | $0.130 |
| Blended $/1M | $1.35 | $0.055 |
| Context window | 512K | 1M |
| Max output | — | 66K |
| Released | Jun 2026 | Jul 2026 |
| Licence | Open weights | Proprietary |
Choose Nemotron 3 Ultra if…
- Open weights — self-hostable
Choose Qwen3.7 Flash if…
- Costs less per token — $0.055 vs $1.35 blended
- Larger context window (1M)
- Newer model (released Jul 2026)
FAQ
Which is better, Nemotron 3 Ultra or Qwen3.7 Flash?
We do not hold independently-run benchmark scores covering both Nemotron 3 Ultra and Qwen3.7 Flash, so we make no quality claim. Their pricing and specifications are compared on this page.
Is Nemotron 3 Ultra cheaper than Qwen3.7 Flash?
Qwen3.7 Flash is cheaper: $0.055 versus $1.35 per million tokens blended at 3:1 input:output. Input alone: $0.600 vs $0.030. Output alone: $3.60 vs $0.130.
What context windows do Nemotron 3 Ultra and Qwen3.7 Flash have?
Nemotron 3 Ultra: 512,288 tokens. Qwen3.7 Flash: 1,000,000 tokens.
Who makes Nemotron 3 Ultra and Qwen3.7 Flash?
Nemotron 3 Ultra is made by NVIDIA. Qwen3.7 Flash is made by Alibaba.
Related comparisons