token.app › Compare › Nemotron 3.5 Super VL vs Qwen3.7 Flash

Nemotron 3.5 Super VL vs Qwen3.7 Flash

Qwen3.7 Flash is 4.3× cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 basis. Nemotron 3.5 Super VL accepts the larger context window (1.0M).

Head to head
Blended price uses a 3:1 input:output mix
Nemotron 3.5 Super VLQwen3.7 Flash
ProviderNVIDIAAlibaba
Input $/1M$0.150$0.030
Output $/1M$0.500$0.130
Blended $/1M$0.237$0.055
Context window1.0M1M
Max output236K66K
ReleasedOct 2026Jul 2026
LicenceOpen weightsProprietary
Choose Nemotron 3.5 Super VL if…
  • Larger context window (1.0M)
  • Open weights — self-hostable
  • Newer model (released Oct 2026)
Choose Qwen3.7 Flash if…
  • Costs less per token — $0.055 vs $0.237 blended
FAQ
Which is better, Nemotron 3.5 Super VL or Qwen3.7 Flash?
We do not hold independently-run benchmark scores covering both Nemotron 3.5 Super VL and Qwen3.7 Flash, so we make no quality claim. Their pricing and specifications are compared on this page.
Is Nemotron 3.5 Super VL cheaper than Qwen3.7 Flash?
Qwen3.7 Flash is cheaper: $0.055 versus $0.237 per million tokens blended at 3:1 input:output. Input alone: $0.150 vs $0.030. Output alone: $0.500 vs $0.130.
What context windows do Nemotron 3.5 Super VL and Qwen3.7 Flash have?
Nemotron 3.5 Super VL: 1,048,576 tokens. Qwen3.7 Flash: 1,000,000 tokens.
Who makes Nemotron 3.5 Super VL and Qwen3.7 Flash?
Nemotron 3.5 Super VL is made by NVIDIA. Qwen3.7 Flash is made by Alibaba.
Related comparisons
Nemotron 3.5 Super VL full details Qwen3.7 Flash full details Nemotron 3.5 Super VL vs Flint (free) Nemotron 3.5 Super VL vs MiniMax M3.1 Flash (free) Nemotron 3.5 Super VL vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 Nemotron 3.5 Super VL vs Glimpse Nemotron 3.5 Super VL vs Xing4.0 29B A4B (free) Nemotron 3.5 Super VL vs Beam 1.0 501B A23B