token.app › Compare › Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct vs GPT-5.6 Luna

Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct vs GPT-5.6 Luna

GPT-5.6 Luna is 3.3× cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 basis. GPT-5.6 Luna accepts the larger context window (1.1M).

Head to head
Blended price uses a 3:1 input:output mix
Qwen2.5 Coder 32B InstructGPT-5.6 Luna
ProviderAlibabaOpenAI
Input $/1M$0.660$0.100
Output $/1M$1.00$0.600
Blended $/1M$0.745$0.225
Context window33K1.1M
Max output33K128K
ReleasedNov 2024Jul 2026
LicenceOpen weightsProprietary
Choose Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct if…
  • Open weights — self-hostable
Choose GPT-5.6 Luna if…
  • Costs less per token — $0.225 vs $0.745 blended
  • Larger context window (1.1M)
  • Newer model (released Jul 2026)
FAQ
Which is better, Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct or GPT-5.6 Luna?
We do not hold independently-run benchmark scores covering both Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct and GPT-5.6 Luna, so we make no quality claim. Their pricing and specifications are compared on this page.
Is Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct cheaper than GPT-5.6 Luna?
GPT-5.6 Luna is cheaper: $0.225 versus $0.745 per million tokens blended at 3:1 input:output. Input alone: $0.660 vs $0.100. Output alone: $1.00 vs $0.600.
What context windows do Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct and GPT-5.6 Luna have?
Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct: 32,768 tokens. GPT-5.6 Luna: 1,050,000 tokens.
Who makes Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct and GPT-5.6 Luna?
Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct is made by Alibaba. GPT-5.6 Luna is made by OpenAI.
Related comparisons
Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct full details GPT-5.6 Luna full details Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct vs Ling 3.0 Tiny (free) Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct vs Muse Spark 1.2 Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct vs Qwen3.8 Max Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct vs DeepSeek V4 Flash Latest Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct vs DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct vs Inkling Small