token.app › Compare › Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct vs Inkling Small

Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct vs Inkling Small

Inkling Small is 1.2× cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 basis. Inkling Small accepts the larger context window (524K).

Head to head
Blended price uses a 3:1 input:output mix
Qwen2.5 Coder 32B InstructInkling Small
ProviderAlibabaThinkingmachines
Input $/1M$0.660$0.450
Output $/1M$1.00$1.20
Blended $/1M$0.745$0.637
Context window33K524K
Max output33K262K
ReleasedNov 2024Jul 2026
LicenceOpen weightsOpen weights
Choose Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct if…
  • No clear advantage on the data we hold.
Choose Inkling Small if…
  • Costs less per token — $0.637 vs $0.745 blended
  • Larger context window (524K)
  • Newer model (released Jul 2026)
FAQ
Which is better, Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct or Inkling Small?
We do not hold independently-run benchmark scores covering both Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct and Inkling Small, so we make no quality claim. Their pricing and specifications are compared on this page.
Is Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct cheaper than Inkling Small?
Inkling Small is cheaper: $0.637 versus $0.745 per million tokens blended at 3:1 input:output. Input alone: $0.660 vs $0.450. Output alone: $1.00 vs $1.20.
What context windows do Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct and Inkling Small have?
Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct: 32,768 tokens. Inkling Small: 524,288 tokens.
Who makes Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct and Inkling Small?
Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct is made by Alibaba. Inkling Small is made by Thinkingmachines.
Related comparisons
Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct full details Inkling Small full details Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct vs Ling 3.0 Tiny (free) Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct vs Muse Spark 1.2 Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct vs Qwen3.8 Max Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct vs DeepSeek V4 Flash Latest Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct vs DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct vs Qwen3.7 Flash