token.app › Compare › Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct vs Kimi K3

Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct vs Kimi K3

Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct is 8.1× cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 basis. Kimi K3 accepts the larger context window (1.0M).

Head to head
Blended price uses a 3:1 input:output mix
Qwen2.5 Coder 32B InstructKimi K3
ProviderAlibabaMoonshot AI
Input $/1M$0.660$3.00
Output $/1M$1.00$15.00
Blended $/1M$0.745$6.00
Context window33K1.0M
Max output33K—
ReleasedNov 2024Jul 2026
LicenceOpen weightsOpen weights
Choose Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct if…
  • Costs less per token — $0.745 vs $6.00 blended
Choose Kimi K3 if…
  • Larger context window (1.0M)
  • Newer model (released Jul 2026)
FAQ
Which is better, Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct or Kimi K3?
We do not hold independently-run benchmark scores covering both Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct and Kimi K3, so we make no quality claim. Their pricing and specifications are compared on this page.
Is Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct cheaper than Kimi K3?
Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct is cheaper: $0.745 versus $6.00 per million tokens blended at 3:1 input:output. Input alone: $0.660 vs $3.00. Output alone: $1.00 vs $15.00.
What context windows do Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct and Kimi K3 have?
Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct: 32,768 tokens. Kimi K3: 1,048,576 tokens.
Who makes Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct and Kimi K3?
Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct is made by Alibaba. Kimi K3 is made by Moonshot AI.
Related comparisons
Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct full details Kimi K3 full details Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct vs Ling 3.0 Tiny (free) Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct vs Muse Spark 1.2 Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct vs Qwen3.8 Max Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct vs DeepSeek V4 Flash Latest Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct vs DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct vs Inkling Small