token.app › Compare › Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct vs GPT-5.6 Luna

Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct vs GPT-5.6 Luna

GPT-5.6 Luna is 1.7× cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 basis. GPT-5.6 Luna accepts the larger context window (1.1M).

Head to head
Blended price uses a 3:1 input:output mix
Qwen2.5 VL 72B InstructGPT-5.6 Luna
ProviderAlibabaOpenAI
Input $/1M$0.250$0.100
Output $/1M$0.750$0.600
Blended $/1M$0.375$0.225
Context window128K1.1M
Max output—128K
ReleasedFeb 2025Jul 2026
LicenceOpen weightsProprietary
Choose Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct if…
  • Open weights — self-hostable
Choose GPT-5.6 Luna if…
  • Costs less per token — $0.225 vs $0.375 blended
  • Larger context window (1.1M)
  • Newer model (released Jul 2026)
FAQ
Which is better, Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct or GPT-5.6 Luna?
We do not hold independently-run benchmark scores covering both Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct and GPT-5.6 Luna, so we make no quality claim. Their pricing and specifications are compared on this page.
Is Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct cheaper than GPT-5.6 Luna?
GPT-5.6 Luna is cheaper: $0.225 versus $0.375 per million tokens blended at 3:1 input:output. Input alone: $0.250 vs $0.100. Output alone: $0.750 vs $0.600.
What context windows do Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct and GPT-5.6 Luna have?
Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct: 128,000 tokens. GPT-5.6 Luna: 1,050,000 tokens.
Who makes Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct and GPT-5.6 Luna?
Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct is made by Alibaba. GPT-5.6 Luna is made by OpenAI.
Related comparisons
Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct full details GPT-5.6 Luna full details Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct vs Ling 3.0 Tiny (free) Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct vs Muse Spark 1.2 Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct vs Qwen3.8 Max Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct vs DeepSeek V4 Flash Latest Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct vs DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct vs Inkling Small