token.app › Compare › Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 vs Qwen3.7 Flash

Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 vs Qwen3.7 Flash

Qwen3.7 Flash is 14× cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 basis. Qwen3.7 Flash accepts the larger context window (1M).

Head to head
Blended price uses a 3:1 input:output mix
Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507Qwen3.7 Flash
ProviderAlibabaAlibaba
Input $/1M$0.230$0.030
Output $/1M$2.30$0.130
Blended $/1M$0.747$0.055
Context window262K1M
Max output66K
ReleasedJul 2025Jul 2026
LicenceOpen weightsProprietary
Choose Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 if…
  • Open weights — self-hostable
Choose Qwen3.7 Flash if…
  • Costs less per token — $0.055 vs $0.747 blended
  • Larger context window (1M)
  • Newer model (released Jul 2026)
FAQ
Which is better, Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 or Qwen3.7 Flash?
We do not hold independently-run benchmark scores covering both Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 and Qwen3.7 Flash, so we make no quality claim. Their pricing and specifications are compared on this page.
Is Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 cheaper than Qwen3.7 Flash?
Qwen3.7 Flash is cheaper: $0.055 versus $0.747 per million tokens blended at 3:1 input:output. Input alone: $0.230 vs $0.030. Output alone: $2.30 vs $0.130.
What context windows do Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 and Qwen3.7 Flash have?
Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507: 262,144 tokens. Qwen3.7 Flash: 1,000,000 tokens.
Who makes Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 and Qwen3.7 Flash?
Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 is made by Alibaba. Qwen3.7 Flash is made by Alibaba.
Related comparisons