token.app › Compare › Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 vs Inkling Small

Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 vs Inkling Small

Inkling Small is 1.9× cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 basis. Inkling Small accepts the larger context window (524K).

Head to head
Blended price uses a 3:1 input:output mix
Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507Inkling Small
ProviderAlibabaThinkingmachines
Input $/1M$0.450$0.450
Output $/1M$3.50$1.20
Blended $/1M$1.21$0.637
Context window128K524K
Max output16K262K
ReleasedJul 2025Jul 2026
LicenceOpen weightsOpen weights
Choose Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 if…
  • No clear advantage on the data we hold.
Choose Inkling Small if…
  • Costs less per token — $0.637 vs $1.21 blended
  • Larger context window (524K)
  • Newer model (released Jul 2026)
FAQ
Which is better, Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 or Inkling Small?
We do not hold independently-run benchmark scores covering both Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 and Inkling Small, so we make no quality claim. Their pricing and specifications are compared on this page.
Is Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 cheaper than Inkling Small?
Inkling Small is cheaper: $0.637 versus $1.21 per million tokens blended at 3:1 input:output. Input alone: $0.450 vs $0.450. Output alone: $3.50 vs $1.20.
What context windows do Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 and Inkling Small have?
Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507: 128,000 tokens. Inkling Small: 524,288 tokens.
Who makes Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 and Inkling Small?
Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 is made by Alibaba. Inkling Small is made by Thinkingmachines.
Related comparisons
Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 full details Inkling Small full details Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 vs Flint (free) Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 vs MiniMax M3.1 Flash (free) Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 vs Glimpse Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 vs Xing4.0 29B A4B (free) Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 vs Beam 1.0 501B A23B