token.app › Compare › Qwen3 30B A3B vs DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731

Qwen3 30B A3B vs DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731

DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 is 1.9× cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 basis. DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 accepts the larger context window (1.0M).

Head to head
Blended price uses a 3:1 input:output mix
Qwen3 30B A3BDeepSeek V4 Flash 0731
ProviderAlibabaDeepSeek
Input $/1M$0.120$0.090
Output $/1M$0.500$0.180
Blended $/1M$0.215$0.113
Context window131K1.0M
Max output16K384K
ReleasedApr 2025Jul 2026
LicenceOpen weightsOpen weights
Choose Qwen3 30B A3B if…
  • No clear advantage on the data we hold.
Choose DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 if…
  • Costs less per token — $0.113 vs $0.215 blended
  • Larger context window (1.0M)
  • Newer model (released Jul 2026)
FAQ
Which is better, Qwen3 30B A3B or DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731?
We do not hold independently-run benchmark scores covering both Qwen3 30B A3B and DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731, so we make no quality claim. Their pricing and specifications are compared on this page.
Is Qwen3 30B A3B cheaper than DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731?
DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 is cheaper: $0.113 versus $0.215 per million tokens blended at 3:1 input:output. Input alone: $0.120 vs $0.090. Output alone: $0.500 vs $0.180.
What context windows do Qwen3 30B A3B and DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 have?
Qwen3 30B A3B: 131,072 tokens. DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731: 1,048,576 tokens.
Who makes Qwen3 30B A3B and DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731?
Qwen3 30B A3B is made by Alibaba. DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 is made by DeepSeek.
Related comparisons