token.app › Compare › Qwen3 30B A3B vs Gemini 3.7 Flash

Qwen3 30B A3B vs Gemini 3.7 Flash

Qwen3 30B A3B is 7.0× cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 basis. Gemini 3.7 Flash accepts the larger context window (1.0M).

Head to head
Blended price uses a 3:1 input:output mix
Qwen3 30B A3BGemini 3.7 Flash
ProviderAlibabaGoogle
Input $/1M$0.120$0.750
Output $/1M$0.500$3.75
Blended $/1M$0.215$1.50
Context window41K1.0M
Max output16K66K
ReleasedApr 2025Aug 2026
LicenceOpen weightsProprietary
Choose Qwen3 30B A3B if…
  • Costs less per token — $0.215 vs $1.50 blended
  • Open weights — self-hostable
Choose Gemini 3.7 Flash if…
  • Larger context window (1.0M)
  • Newer model (released Aug 2026)
FAQ
Which is better, Qwen3 30B A3B or Gemini 3.7 Flash?
We do not hold independently-run benchmark scores covering both Qwen3 30B A3B and Gemini 3.7 Flash, so we make no quality claim. Their pricing and specifications are compared on this page.
Is Qwen3 30B A3B cheaper than Gemini 3.7 Flash?
Qwen3 30B A3B is cheaper: $0.215 versus $1.50 per million tokens blended at 3:1 input:output. Input alone: $0.120 vs $0.750. Output alone: $0.500 vs $3.75.
What context windows do Qwen3 30B A3B and Gemini 3.7 Flash have?
Qwen3 30B A3B: 40,960 tokens. Gemini 3.7 Flash: 1,048,576 tokens.
Who makes Qwen3 30B A3B and Gemini 3.7 Flash?
Qwen3 30B A3B is made by Alibaba. Gemini 3.7 Flash is made by Google.
Related comparisons