token.app › Compare › Qwen3 32B vs Beam 1.0 501B A23B
Qwen3 32B vs Beam 1.0 501B A23B
Qwen3 32B is 3.4× cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 basis. Beam 1.0 501B A23B accepts the larger context window (1.0M).
Head to head
Blended price uses a 3:1 input:output mix
| Qwen3 32B | Beam 1.0 501B A23B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Alibaba | Reflection |
| Input $/1M | $0.080 | $0.250 |
| Output $/1M | $0.280 | $1.00 |
| Blended $/1M | $0.130 | $0.438 |
| Context window | 131K | 1.0M |
| Max output | 16K | 131K |
| Released | Apr 2025 | Oct 2026 |
| Licence | Open weights | Open weights |
Choose Qwen3 32B if…
- Costs less per token — $0.130 vs $0.438 blended
Choose Beam 1.0 501B A23B if…
- Larger context window (1.0M)
- Newer model (released Oct 2026)
FAQ
Which is better, Qwen3 32B or Beam 1.0 501B A23B?
We do not hold independently-run benchmark scores covering both Qwen3 32B and Beam 1.0 501B A23B, so we make no quality claim. Their pricing and specifications are compared on this page.
Is Qwen3 32B cheaper than Beam 1.0 501B A23B?
Qwen3 32B is cheaper: $0.130 versus $0.438 per million tokens blended at 3:1 input:output. Input alone: $0.080 vs $0.250. Output alone: $0.280 vs $1.00.
What context windows do Qwen3 32B and Beam 1.0 501B A23B have?
Qwen3 32B: 131,072 tokens. Beam 1.0 501B A23B: 1,048,576 tokens.
Who makes Qwen3 32B and Beam 1.0 501B A23B?
Qwen3 32B is made by Alibaba. Beam 1.0 501B A23B is made by Reflection.