token.app › Compare › Qwen3 32B vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
Qwen3 32B vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
Qwen3 32B is 2.0× cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 basis. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 accepts the larger context window (1.0M).
Head to head
Blended price uses a 3:1 input:output mix
| Qwen3 32B | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Alibaba | DeepSeek |
| Input $/1M | $0.080 | $0.150 |
| Output $/1M | $0.280 | $0.600 |
| Blended $/1M | $0.130 | $0.262 |
| Context window | 131K | 1.0M |
| Max output | 16K | 393K |
| Released | Apr 2025 | Oct 2026 |
| Licence | Open weights | Open weights |
Choose Qwen3 32B if…
- Costs less per token — $0.130 vs $0.262 blended
Choose DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 if…
- Larger context window (1.0M)
- Newer model (released Oct 2026)
FAQ
Which is better, Qwen3 32B or DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017?
We do not hold independently-run benchmark scores covering both Qwen3 32B and DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017, so we make no quality claim. Their pricing and specifications are compared on this page.
Is Qwen3 32B cheaper than DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017?
Qwen3 32B is cheaper: $0.130 versus $0.262 per million tokens blended at 3:1 input:output. Input alone: $0.080 vs $0.150. Output alone: $0.280 vs $0.600.
What context windows do Qwen3 32B and DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 have?
Qwen3 32B: 131,072 tokens. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017: 1,048,576 tokens.
Who makes Qwen3 32B and DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017?
Qwen3 32B is made by Alibaba. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 is made by DeepSeek.