token.app › Compare › Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking vs DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731

Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking vs DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731

DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 is 12× cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 basis. DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 accepts the larger context window (1.0M).

Head to head
Blended price uses a 3:1 input:output mix
Qwen3 VL 235B A22B ThinkingDeepSeek V4 Flash 0731
ProviderAlibabaDeepSeek
Input $/1M$0.400$0.090
Output $/1M$4.00$0.180
Blended $/1M$1.30$0.113
Context window131K1.0M
Max output33K384K
ReleasedSep 2025Jul 2026
LicenceOpen weightsOpen weights
Choose Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking if…
  • No clear advantage on the data we hold.
Choose DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 if…
  • Costs less per token — $0.113 vs $1.30 blended
  • Larger context window (1.0M)
  • Newer model (released Jul 2026)
FAQ
Which is better, Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking or DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731?
We do not hold independently-run benchmark scores covering both Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking and DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731, so we make no quality claim. Their pricing and specifications are compared on this page.
Is Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking cheaper than DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731?
DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 is cheaper: $0.113 versus $1.30 per million tokens blended at 3:1 input:output. Input alone: $0.400 vs $0.090. Output alone: $4.00 vs $0.180.
What context windows do Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking and DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 have?
Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking: 131,072 tokens. DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731: 1,048,576 tokens.
Who makes Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking and DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731?
Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking is made by Alibaba. DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 is made by DeepSeek.
Related comparisons
Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking full details DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 full details Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking vs Ling 3.0 Tiny (free) Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking vs Muse Spark 1.2 Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking vs Qwen3.8 Max Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking vs DeepSeek V4 Flash Latest Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking vs Inkling Small Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking vs Qwen3.7 Flash