token.app › Compare › Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking vs Qwen3.7 Flash

Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking vs Qwen3.7 Flash

Qwen3.7 Flash is 24× cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 basis. Qwen3.7 Flash accepts the larger context window (1M).

Head to head
Blended price uses a 3:1 input:output mix
Qwen3 VL 235B A22B ThinkingQwen3.7 Flash
ProviderAlibabaAlibaba
Input $/1M$0.400$0.030
Output $/1M$4.00$0.130
Blended $/1M$1.30$0.055
Context window131K1M
Max output33K66K
ReleasedSep 2025Jul 2026
LicenceOpen weightsProprietary
Choose Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking if…
  • Open weights — self-hostable
Choose Qwen3.7 Flash if…
  • Costs less per token — $0.055 vs $1.30 blended
  • Larger context window (1M)
  • Newer model (released Jul 2026)
FAQ
Which is better, Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking or Qwen3.7 Flash?
We do not hold independently-run benchmark scores covering both Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking and Qwen3.7 Flash, so we make no quality claim. Their pricing and specifications are compared on this page.
Is Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking cheaper than Qwen3.7 Flash?
Qwen3.7 Flash is cheaper: $0.055 versus $1.30 per million tokens blended at 3:1 input:output. Input alone: $0.400 vs $0.030. Output alone: $4.00 vs $0.130.
What context windows do Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking and Qwen3.7 Flash have?
Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking: 131,072 tokens. Qwen3.7 Flash: 1,000,000 tokens.
Who makes Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking and Qwen3.7 Flash?
Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking is made by Alibaba. Qwen3.7 Flash is made by Alibaba.
Related comparisons
Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking full details Qwen3.7 Flash full details Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking vs Ling 3.0 Tiny (free) Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking vs Muse Spark 1.2 Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking vs Qwen3.8 Max Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking vs DeepSeek V4 Flash Latest Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking vs DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking vs Inkling Small