token.app › Compare › Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking vs Grok 4.5

Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking vs Grok 4.5

Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking is 2.3× cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 basis. Grok 4.5 accepts the larger context window (500K).

Head to head
Blended price uses a 3:1 input:output mix
Qwen3 VL 235B A22B ThinkingGrok 4.5
ProviderAlibabaxAI
Input $/1M$0.400$2.00
Output $/1M$4.00$6.00
Blended $/1M$1.30$3.00
Context window131K500K
Max output33K—
ReleasedSep 2025Jul 2026
LicenceOpen weightsProprietary
Choose Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking if…
  • Costs less per token — $1.30 vs $3.00 blended
  • Open weights — self-hostable
Choose Grok 4.5 if…
  • Larger context window (500K)
  • Newer model (released Jul 2026)
FAQ
Which is better, Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking or Grok 4.5?
We do not hold independently-run benchmark scores covering both Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking and Grok 4.5, so we make no quality claim. Their pricing and specifications are compared on this page.
Is Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking cheaper than Grok 4.5?
Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking is cheaper: $1.30 versus $3.00 per million tokens blended at 3:1 input:output. Input alone: $0.400 vs $2.00. Output alone: $4.00 vs $6.00.
What context windows do Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking and Grok 4.5 have?
Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking: 131,072 tokens. Grok 4.5: 500,000 tokens.
Who makes Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking and Grok 4.5?
Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking is made by Alibaba. Grok 4.5 is made by xAI.
Related comparisons
Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking full details Grok 4.5 full details Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking vs Ling 3.0 Tiny (free) Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking vs Muse Spark 1.2 Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking vs Qwen3.8 Max Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking vs DeepSeek V4 Flash Latest Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking vs DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking vs Inkling Small