token.app › Compare › Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking vs Claude Opus 5

Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking vs Claude Opus 5

Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking is 21× cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 basis. Claude Opus 5 accepts the larger context window (1M).

Head to head
Blended price uses a 3:1 input:output mix
Qwen3 VL 30B A3B ThinkingClaude Opus 5
ProviderAlibabaAnthropic
Input $/1M$0.290$5.00
Output $/1M$1.00$25.00
Blended $/1M$0.467$10.00
Context window262K1M
Max output236K128K
ReleasedOct 2025Jul 2026
LicenceOpen weightsProprietary
Choose Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking if…
  • Costs less per token — $0.467 vs $10.00 blended
  • Open weights — self-hostable
Choose Claude Opus 5 if…
  • Larger context window (1M)
  • Newer model (released Jul 2026)
FAQ
Which is better, Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking or Claude Opus 5?
We do not hold independently-run benchmark scores covering both Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking and Claude Opus 5, so we make no quality claim. Their pricing and specifications are compared on this page.
Is Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking cheaper than Claude Opus 5?
Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking is cheaper: $0.467 versus $10.00 per million tokens blended at 3:1 input:output. Input alone: $0.290 vs $5.00. Output alone: $1.00 vs $25.00.
What context windows do Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking and Claude Opus 5 have?
Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking: 262,144 tokens. Claude Opus 5: 1,000,000 tokens.
Who makes Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking and Claude Opus 5?
Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking is made by Alibaba. Claude Opus 5 is made by Anthropic.
Related comparisons
Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking full details Claude Opus 5 full details Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking vs Flint (free) Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking vs MiniMax M3.1 Flash (free) Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking vs Glimpse Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking vs Xing4.0 29B A4B (free) Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking vs Beam 1.0 501B A23B