token.app › Compare › Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking vs Inkling

Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking vs Inkling

Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking is 3.8× cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 basis. Inkling accepts the larger context window (524K).

Head to head
Blended price uses a 3:1 input:output mix
Qwen3 VL 30B A3B ThinkingInkling
ProviderAlibabaThinkingmachines
Input $/1M$0.290$1.00
Output $/1M$1.00$4.05
Blended $/1M$0.467$1.76
Context window262K524K
Max output236K472K
ReleasedOct 2025Jul 2026
LicenceOpen weightsOpen weights
Choose Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking if…
  • Costs less per token — $0.467 vs $1.76 blended
Choose Inkling if…
  • Larger context window (524K)
  • Newer model (released Jul 2026)
FAQ
Which is better, Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking or Inkling?
We do not hold independently-run benchmark scores covering both Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking and Inkling, so we make no quality claim. Their pricing and specifications are compared on this page.
Is Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking cheaper than Inkling?
Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking is cheaper: $0.467 versus $1.76 per million tokens blended at 3:1 input:output. Input alone: $0.290 vs $1.00. Output alone: $1.00 vs $4.05.
What context windows do Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking and Inkling have?
Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking: 262,144 tokens. Inkling: 524,288 tokens.
Who makes Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking and Inkling?
Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking is made by Alibaba. Inkling is made by Thinkingmachines.
Related comparisons
Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking full details Inkling full details Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking vs Flint (free) Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking vs MiniMax M3.1 Flash (free) Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking vs Glimpse Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking vs Xing4.0 29B A4B (free) Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking vs Beam 1.0 501B A23B