token.app › Compare › Qwen3.5-122B-A10B vs Beam 1.0 501B A23B
Qwen3.5-122B-A10B vs Beam 1.0 501B A23B
Beam 1.0 501B A23B is 2.5× cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 basis. Beam 1.0 501B A23B accepts the larger context window (1.0M).
Head to head
Blended price uses a 3:1 input:output mix
| Qwen3.5-122B-A10B | Beam 1.0 501B A23B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Alibaba | Reflection |
| Input $/1M | $0.400 | $0.250 |
| Output $/1M | $3.20 | $1.00 |
| Blended $/1M | $1.10 | $0.438 |
| Context window | 262K | 1.0M |
| Max output | 66K | 131K |
| Released | Feb 2026 | Oct 2026 |
| Licence | Open weights | Open weights |
Choose Qwen3.5-122B-A10B if…
- No clear advantage on the data we hold.
Choose Beam 1.0 501B A23B if…
- Costs less per token — $0.438 vs $1.10 blended
- Larger context window (1.0M)
- Newer model (released Oct 2026)
FAQ
Which is better, Qwen3.5-122B-A10B or Beam 1.0 501B A23B?
We do not hold independently-run benchmark scores covering both Qwen3.5-122B-A10B and Beam 1.0 501B A23B, so we make no quality claim. Their pricing and specifications are compared on this page.
Is Qwen3.5-122B-A10B cheaper than Beam 1.0 501B A23B?
Beam 1.0 501B A23B is cheaper: $0.438 versus $1.10 per million tokens blended at 3:1 input:output. Input alone: $0.400 vs $0.250. Output alone: $3.20 vs $1.00.
What context windows do Qwen3.5-122B-A10B and Beam 1.0 501B A23B have?
Qwen3.5-122B-A10B: 262,144 tokens. Beam 1.0 501B A23B: 1,048,576 tokens.
Who makes Qwen3.5-122B-A10B and Beam 1.0 501B A23B?
Qwen3.5-122B-A10B is made by Alibaba. Beam 1.0 501B A23B is made by Reflection.
Related comparisons