token.app › Compare › Qwen3.5-122B-A10B vs Mercury 3
Qwen3.5-122B-A10B vs Mercury 3
Mercury 3 is 6.8× cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 basis. Mercury 3 accepts the larger context window (1M).
Head to head
Blended price uses a 3:1 input:output mix
| Qwen3.5-122B-A10B | Mercury 3 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Alibaba | Inception |
| Input $/1M | $0.400 | $0.100 |
| Output $/1M | $3.20 | $0.350 |
| Blended $/1M | $1.10 | $0.163 |
| Context window | 262K | 1M |
| Max output | 66K | 131K |
| Released | Feb 2026 | Oct 2026 |
| Licence | Open weights | Proprietary |
Choose Qwen3.5-122B-A10B if…
- Open weights — self-hostable
Choose Mercury 3 if…
- Costs less per token — $0.163 vs $1.10 blended
- Larger context window (1M)
- Newer model (released Oct 2026)
FAQ
Which is better, Qwen3.5-122B-A10B or Mercury 3?
We do not hold independently-run benchmark scores covering both Qwen3.5-122B-A10B and Mercury 3, so we make no quality claim. Their pricing and specifications are compared on this page.
Is Qwen3.5-122B-A10B cheaper than Mercury 3?
Mercury 3 is cheaper: $0.163 versus $1.10 per million tokens blended at 3:1 input:output. Input alone: $0.400 vs $0.100. Output alone: $3.20 vs $0.350.
What context windows do Qwen3.5-122B-A10B and Mercury 3 have?
Qwen3.5-122B-A10B: 262,144 tokens. Mercury 3: 1,000,000 tokens.
Who makes Qwen3.5-122B-A10B and Mercury 3?
Qwen3.5-122B-A10B is made by Alibaba. Mercury 3 is made by Inception.
Related comparisons