token.app › Compare › Qwen3.5-122B-A10B vs Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite

Qwen3.5-122B-A10B vs Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite

Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite is 1.3× cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 basis. Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite accepts the larger context window (1.0M).

Head to head
Blended price uses a 3:1 input:output mix
Qwen3.5-122B-A10BGemini 3.5 Flash Lite
ProviderAlibabaGoogle
Input $/1M$0.400$0.300
Output $/1M$3.20$2.50
Blended $/1M$1.10$0.850
Context window262K1.0M
Max output66K66K
ReleasedFeb 2026Jul 2026
LicenceOpen weightsProprietary
Choose Qwen3.5-122B-A10B if…
  • Open weights — self-hostable
Choose Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite if…
  • Costs less per token — $0.850 vs $1.10 blended
  • Larger context window (1.0M)
  • Newer model (released Jul 2026)
FAQ
Which is better, Qwen3.5-122B-A10B or Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite?
We do not hold independently-run benchmark scores covering both Qwen3.5-122B-A10B and Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite, so we make no quality claim. Their pricing and specifications are compared on this page.
Is Qwen3.5-122B-A10B cheaper than Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite?
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite is cheaper: $0.850 versus $1.10 per million tokens blended at 3:1 input:output. Input alone: $0.400 vs $0.300. Output alone: $3.20 vs $2.50.
What context windows do Qwen3.5-122B-A10B and Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite have?
Qwen3.5-122B-A10B: 262,144 tokens. Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 1,048,576 tokens.
Who makes Qwen3.5-122B-A10B and Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite?
Qwen3.5-122B-A10B is made by Alibaba. Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite is made by Google.
Related comparisons
Qwen3.5-122B-A10B full details Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite full details Qwen3.5-122B-A10B vs Flint (free) Qwen3.5-122B-A10B vs MiniMax M3.1 Flash (free) Qwen3.5-122B-A10B vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 Qwen3.5-122B-A10B vs Glimpse Qwen3.5-122B-A10B vs Xing4.0 29B A4B (free) Qwen3.5-122B-A10B vs Beam 1.0 501B A23B