token.app › Compare › Qwen3.5-122B-A10B vs Gemini 3.6 Flash

Qwen3.5-122B-A10B vs Gemini 3.6 Flash

Qwen3.5-122B-A10B is 1.4× cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 basis. Gemini 3.6 Flash accepts the larger context window (1.0M).

Head to head
Blended price uses a 3:1 input:output mix
Qwen3.5-122B-A10BGemini 3.6 Flash
ProviderAlibabaGoogle
Input $/1M$0.400$0.750
Output $/1M$3.20$3.75
Blended $/1M$1.10$1.50
Context window262K1.0M
Max output66K66K
ReleasedFeb 2026Jul 2026
LicenceOpen weightsProprietary
Choose Qwen3.5-122B-A10B if…
  • Costs less per token — $1.10 vs $1.50 blended
  • Open weights — self-hostable
Choose Gemini 3.6 Flash if…
  • Larger context window (1.0M)
  • Newer model (released Jul 2026)
FAQ
Which is better, Qwen3.5-122B-A10B or Gemini 3.6 Flash?
We do not hold independently-run benchmark scores covering both Qwen3.5-122B-A10B and Gemini 3.6 Flash, so we make no quality claim. Their pricing and specifications are compared on this page.
Is Qwen3.5-122B-A10B cheaper than Gemini 3.6 Flash?
Qwen3.5-122B-A10B is cheaper: $1.10 versus $1.50 per million tokens blended at 3:1 input:output. Input alone: $0.400 vs $0.750. Output alone: $3.20 vs $3.75.
What context windows do Qwen3.5-122B-A10B and Gemini 3.6 Flash have?
Qwen3.5-122B-A10B: 262,144 tokens. Gemini 3.6 Flash: 1,048,576 tokens.
Who makes Qwen3.5-122B-A10B and Gemini 3.6 Flash?
Qwen3.5-122B-A10B is made by Alibaba. Gemini 3.6 Flash is made by Google.
Related comparisons