token.app › Compare › Qwen3.5-122B-A10B vs Grok 4.6

Qwen3.5-122B-A10B vs Grok 4.6

Qwen3.5-122B-A10B is 2.7× cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 basis. Grok 4.6 accepts the larger context window (500K).

Head to head
Blended price uses a 3:1 input:output mix
Qwen3.5-122B-A10BGrok 4.6
ProviderAlibabaSpaceXAI
Input $/1M$0.400$2.00
Output $/1M$3.20$6.00
Blended $/1M$1.10$3.00
Context window262K500K
Max output66K450K
ReleasedFeb 2026Aug 2026
LicenceOpen weightsProprietary
Choose Qwen3.5-122B-A10B if…
  • Costs less per token — $1.10 vs $3.00 blended
  • Open weights — self-hostable
Choose Grok 4.6 if…
  • Larger context window (500K)
  • Newer model (released Aug 2026)
FAQ
Which is better, Qwen3.5-122B-A10B or Grok 4.6?
We do not hold independently-run benchmark scores covering both Qwen3.5-122B-A10B and Grok 4.6, so we make no quality claim. Their pricing and specifications are compared on this page.
Is Qwen3.5-122B-A10B cheaper than Grok 4.6?
Qwen3.5-122B-A10B is cheaper: $1.10 versus $3.00 per million tokens blended at 3:1 input:output. Input alone: $0.400 vs $2.00. Output alone: $3.20 vs $6.00.
What context windows do Qwen3.5-122B-A10B and Grok 4.6 have?
Qwen3.5-122B-A10B: 262,144 tokens. Grok 4.6: 500,000 tokens.
Who makes Qwen3.5-122B-A10B and Grok 4.6?
Qwen3.5-122B-A10B is made by Alibaba. Grok 4.6 is made by SpaceXAI.
Related comparisons