token.app › Compare › Qwen3.5-122B-A10B vs Inkling

Qwen3.5-122B-A10B vs Inkling

Qwen3.5-122B-A10B is 1.6× cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 basis. Inkling accepts the larger context window (524K).

Head to head
Blended price uses a 3:1 input:output mix
Qwen3.5-122B-A10BInkling
ProviderAlibabaThinkingmachines
Input $/1M$0.400$1.00
Output $/1M$3.20$4.05
Blended $/1M$1.10$1.76
Context window262K524K
Max output66K472K
ReleasedFeb 2026Jul 2026
LicenceOpen weightsOpen weights
Choose Qwen3.5-122B-A10B if…
  • Costs less per token — $1.10 vs $1.76 blended
Choose Inkling if…
  • Larger context window (524K)
  • Newer model (released Jul 2026)
FAQ
Which is better, Qwen3.5-122B-A10B or Inkling?
We do not hold independently-run benchmark scores covering both Qwen3.5-122B-A10B and Inkling, so we make no quality claim. Their pricing and specifications are compared on this page.
Is Qwen3.5-122B-A10B cheaper than Inkling?
Qwen3.5-122B-A10B is cheaper: $1.10 versus $1.76 per million tokens blended at 3:1 input:output. Input alone: $0.400 vs $1.00. Output alone: $3.20 vs $4.05.
What context windows do Qwen3.5-122B-A10B and Inkling have?
Qwen3.5-122B-A10B: 262,144 tokens. Inkling: 524,288 tokens.
Who makes Qwen3.5-122B-A10B and Inkling?
Qwen3.5-122B-A10B is made by Alibaba. Inkling is made by Thinkingmachines.
Related comparisons