token.app › Compare › Qwen3.5-Flash vs Qwen3.7 Flash
Qwen3.5-Flash vs Qwen3.7 Flash
Qwen3.7 Flash leads on 2 of 3 shared benchmarks. Qwen3.7 Flash is 2.1× cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 basis.
Head to head
Blended price uses a 3:1 input:output mix
| Qwen3.5-Flash | Qwen3.7 Flash | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Alibaba | Alibaba |
| Input $/1M | $0.065 | $0.030 |
| Output $/1M | $0.260 | $0.130 |
| Blended $/1M | $0.114 | $0.055 |
| Context window | 1M | 1M |
| Max output | 66K | 66K |
| Released | Feb 2026 | Jul 2026 |
| Licence | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| GPQA Diamond | 82.3% | 82.3% |
| FrontierMath T1–3 | 18.2% | 19.3% |
| OTIS Mock AIME | 84.4% | 86.7% |
Benchmark scores independently run and published by Epoch AI, 'AI Benchmarking Hub', used under CC BY 4.0. Only benchmarks with a score for BOTH models are compared.
Choose Qwen3.5-Flash if…
- No clear advantage on the data we hold.
Choose Qwen3.7 Flash if…
- Costs less per token — $0.055 vs $0.114 blended
- Higher FrontierMath T1–3 (19.3% vs 18.2%)
- Higher OTIS Mock AIME (86.7% vs 84.4%)
- Newer model (released Jul 2026)
FAQ
Which is better, Qwen3.5-Flash or Qwen3.7 Flash?
Across the 3 benchmarks both models have independently-run scores for, Qwen3.5-Flash leads on 0 and Qwen3.7 Flash leads on 2. Benchmarks are one input — price and context window are on this page too.
Is Qwen3.5-Flash cheaper than Qwen3.7 Flash?
Qwen3.7 Flash is cheaper: $0.055 versus $0.114 per million tokens blended at 3:1 input:output. Input alone: $0.065 vs $0.030. Output alone: $0.260 vs $0.130.
What context windows do Qwen3.5-Flash and Qwen3.7 Flash have?
Qwen3.5-Flash: 1,000,000 tokens. Qwen3.7 Flash: 1,000,000 tokens.
Who makes Qwen3.5-Flash and Qwen3.7 Flash?
Qwen3.5-Flash is made by Alibaba. Qwen3.7 Flash is made by Alibaba.