token.app › Compare › Qwen3.6 35B A3B vs Beam 1.0 501B A23B

Qwen3.6 35B A3B vs Beam 1.0 501B A23B

Qwen3.6 35B A3B is 1.4× cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 basis. Beam 1.0 501B A23B accepts the larger context window (1.0M).

Head to head
Blended price uses a 3:1 input:output mix
Qwen3.6 35B A3BBeam 1.0 501B A23B
ProviderAlibabaReflection
Input $/1M$0.100$0.250
Output $/1M$0.950$1.00
Blended $/1M$0.313$0.438
Context window262K1.0M
Max output236K131K
ReleasedApr 2026Oct 2026
LicenceOpen weightsOpen weights
Choose Qwen3.6 35B A3B if…
  • Costs less per token — $0.313 vs $0.438 blended
Choose Beam 1.0 501B A23B if…
  • Larger context window (1.0M)
  • Newer model (released Oct 2026)
FAQ
Which is better, Qwen3.6 35B A3B or Beam 1.0 501B A23B?
We do not hold independently-run benchmark scores covering both Qwen3.6 35B A3B and Beam 1.0 501B A23B, so we make no quality claim. Their pricing and specifications are compared on this page.
Is Qwen3.6 35B A3B cheaper than Beam 1.0 501B A23B?
Qwen3.6 35B A3B is cheaper: $0.313 versus $0.438 per million tokens blended at 3:1 input:output. Input alone: $0.100 vs $0.250. Output alone: $0.950 vs $1.00.
What context windows do Qwen3.6 35B A3B and Beam 1.0 501B A23B have?
Qwen3.6 35B A3B: 262,144 tokens. Beam 1.0 501B A23B: 1,048,576 tokens.
Who makes Qwen3.6 35B A3B and Beam 1.0 501B A23B?
Qwen3.6 35B A3B is made by Alibaba. Beam 1.0 501B A23B is made by Reflection.
Related comparisons