token.app › Compare › Qwen3.6 35B A3B vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017

Qwen3.6 35B A3B vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 is 1.2× cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 basis. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 accepts the larger context window (1.0M).

Head to head
Blended price uses a 3:1 input:output mix
Qwen3.6 35B A3BDeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
ProviderAlibabaDeepSeek
Input $/1M$0.100$0.150
Output $/1M$0.950$0.600
Blended $/1M$0.313$0.262
Context window262K1.0M
Max output236K393K
ReleasedApr 2026Oct 2026
LicenceOpen weightsOpen weights
Choose Qwen3.6 35B A3B if…
  • No clear advantage on the data we hold.
Choose DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 if…
  • Costs less per token — $0.262 vs $0.313 blended
  • Larger context window (1.0M)
  • Newer model (released Oct 2026)
FAQ
Which is better, Qwen3.6 35B A3B or DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017?
We do not hold independently-run benchmark scores covering both Qwen3.6 35B A3B and DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017, so we make no quality claim. Their pricing and specifications are compared on this page.
Is Qwen3.6 35B A3B cheaper than DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017?
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 is cheaper: $0.262 versus $0.313 per million tokens blended at 3:1 input:output. Input alone: $0.100 vs $0.150. Output alone: $0.950 vs $0.600.
What context windows do Qwen3.6 35B A3B and DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 have?
Qwen3.6 35B A3B: 262,144 tokens. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017: 1,048,576 tokens.
Who makes Qwen3.6 35B A3B and DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017?
Qwen3.6 35B A3B is made by Alibaba. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 is made by DeepSeek.
Related comparisons