token.app โ€บ Compare โ€บ Qwen3.6 Flash vs Claude Opus 5

Qwen3.6 Flash vs Claude Opus 5

Claude Opus 5 leads on 3 of 3 shared benchmarks. Qwen3.6 Flash is 24ร— cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 basis.

Head to head
Blended price uses a 3:1 input:output mix
Qwen3.6 FlashClaude Opus 5
ProviderAlibabaAnthropic
Input $/1M$0.188$5.00
Output $/1M$1.13$25.00
Blended $/1M$0.422$10.00
Context window1M1M
Max output66K128K
ReleasedApr 2026Jul 2026
LicenceProprietaryProprietary
GPQA Diamond 83.3% 93.9%
FrontierMath T1โ€“3 22.5% 85.6%
OTIS Mock AIME 84.4% 98.9%
Benchmark scores independently run and published by Epoch AI, 'AI Benchmarking Hub', used under CC BY 4.0. Only benchmarks with a score for BOTH models are compared.
Choose Qwen3.6 Flash ifโ€ฆ
  • Costs less per token โ€” $0.422 vs $10.00 blended
Choose Claude Opus 5 ifโ€ฆ
  • Higher GPQA Diamond (93.9% vs 83.3%)
  • Higher FrontierMath T1โ€“3 (85.6% vs 22.5%)
  • Higher OTIS Mock AIME (98.9% vs 84.4%)
  • Newer model (released Jul 2026)
FAQ
Which is better, Qwen3.6 Flash or Claude Opus 5?
Across the 3 benchmarks both models have independently-run scores for, Qwen3.6 Flash leads on 0 and Claude Opus 5 leads on 3. Benchmarks are one input โ€” price and context window are on this page too.
Is Qwen3.6 Flash cheaper than Claude Opus 5?
Qwen3.6 Flash is cheaper: $0.422 versus $10.00 per million tokens blended at 3:1 input:output. Input alone: $0.188 vs $5.00. Output alone: $1.13 vs $25.00.
What context windows do Qwen3.6 Flash and Claude Opus 5 have?
Qwen3.6 Flash: 1,000,000 tokens. Claude Opus 5: 1,000,000 tokens.
Who makes Qwen3.6 Flash and Claude Opus 5?
Qwen3.6 Flash is made by Alibaba. Claude Opus 5 is made by Anthropic.
Related comparisons