token.app › Compare › Qwen3.8 Omni Flash vs Beam 1.0 501B A23B

Qwen3.8 Omni Flash vs Beam 1.0 501B A23B

Qwen3.8 Omni Flash is 1.9× cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 basis. Beam 1.0 501B A23B accepts the larger context window (1.0M).

Head to head
Blended price uses a 3:1 input:output mix
Qwen3.8 Omni FlashBeam 1.0 501B A23B
ProviderAlibabaReflection
Input $/1M$0.150$0.250
Output $/1M$0.470$1.00
Blended $/1M$0.230$0.438
Context window1M1.0M
Max output131K131K
ReleasedSep 2026Oct 2026
LicenceProprietaryOpen weights
Choose Qwen3.8 Omni Flash if…
  • Costs less per token — $0.230 vs $0.438 blended
Choose Beam 1.0 501B A23B if…
  • Larger context window (1.0M)
  • Open weights — self-hostable
  • Newer model (released Oct 2026)
FAQ
Which is better, Qwen3.8 Omni Flash or Beam 1.0 501B A23B?
We do not hold independently-run benchmark scores covering both Qwen3.8 Omni Flash and Beam 1.0 501B A23B, so we make no quality claim. Their pricing and specifications are compared on this page.
Is Qwen3.8 Omni Flash cheaper than Beam 1.0 501B A23B?
Qwen3.8 Omni Flash is cheaper: $0.230 versus $0.438 per million tokens blended at 3:1 input:output. Input alone: $0.150 vs $0.250. Output alone: $0.470 vs $1.00.
What context windows do Qwen3.8 Omni Flash and Beam 1.0 501B A23B have?
Qwen3.8 Omni Flash: 1,000,000 tokens. Beam 1.0 501B A23B: 1,048,576 tokens.
Who makes Qwen3.8 Omni Flash and Beam 1.0 501B A23B?
Qwen3.8 Omni Flash is made by Alibaba. Beam 1.0 501B A23B is made by Reflection.
Related comparisons